Sunday, July 20, 2014

Philippine Press Institute, Inc. vs. Commission on Elections


G.R. No.119694                       May 22, 1995

Petitioner: Philippine Press Institute, Inc.
Respondent: Commission on Elections

Facts: On 2 March 1995, Comelec promulgated Resolution No. 2772 which reads in part Sec. 2. Comelec Space. — The Commission shall procure free print space of not less than one half (1/2) page in at least one newspaper of general circulation in every province or city for use as "Comelec Space" from March 6, 1995 in the case of candidates for senator and from March 21, 1995 until May 12, 1995. In the absence of said newspaper, "Comelec Space" shall be obtained from any magazine or periodical of said province or city.
In this Petition for Certiorari and Prohibition with prayer for the issuance of a Temporary Restraining Order, PPI asks us to declare Comelec Resolution No. 2772 unconstitutional and void on the ground that it violates the prohibition imposed by the Constitution upon the government, and any of its agencies, against the taking of private property for public use without just compensation. 

Issue:  Whether Section 2 of Resolution No. 2772 constitute a valid exercise of the power of eminent domain


Ruling: The taking of private property for public use is, of course, authorized by the Constitution, but not without payment of "just compensation" (Article III, Section 9). And apparently the necessity of paying compensation for "Comelec space" is precisely what is sought to be avoided by respondent Commission, whether Section 2 of Resolution No. 2772 is read as petitioner PPI reads it, as an assertion of authority to require newspaper publishers to "donate" free print space for Comelec purposes, or as an exhortation, or perhaps an appeal, to publishers to donate free print space, as Section 1 of Resolution No. 2772-A attempts to suggest. There is nothing at all to prevent newspaper and magazine publishers from voluntarily giving free print space to Comelec for the purposes contemplated in Resolution No. 2772. Section 2 of Resolution No. 2772 does not, however, provide a constitutional basis for compelling publishers, against their will, in the kind of factual context here present, to provide free print space for Comelec purposes. Section 2 does not constitute a valid exercise of the power of eminent domain

1 comment:

  1. Tag : TITINNIA BONUS | Titanium Network Surf Free Sprites
    TITINNIA BONUS | titanium water bottle TITINNIA tecate titanium BONUS. 1.0. TITINNIA titanium engagement rings BONUS - Play and win! titanium legs Play now! head titanium ti s6

    ReplyDelete

People v Alapan

People v Alapan GR No. 199527, January 10, 2018 Martires, J.: Subsidiary imprisonment in case of insolvency must be expressly sta...